 |
| Diagram shows the crux of the paragraph |
Here's a paragraph-wise analysis of the chapter **“Literature and the Writer’s Personality”** along with key figures, main points, and relevant definitions/examples:
---
### **Paragraph 1**
**Main Point:**
Literature is deeply connected to the **personality of the author**. There’s always a human mind and heart behind a literary work.
**Key Idea:**
We shouldn’t view the author as a mysterious, disembodied figure but as a **real human** responding to real-life needs and challenges. Literature doesn't come from nowhere; it is a **product of human effort and emotion**.
**Definition/Example:**
This implies a **personal view of literature**, where the author’s experiences, struggles, and emotions shape the work. For example, Leo Tolstoy’s *War and Peace* reflects his views on war and human nature.
---
### **Paragraph 2**
**Main Figure: Matthew Arnold**
**Main Point:**
Arnold believes that every book reflects the **author’s personality**.
**Key Idea:**
What touches us in literature is not the subject alone but the **character, mood, and intention** of the writer. Literature conveys not only the content but the **essence of the author’s inner self**.
**Example:**
Romantic poets like **Wordsworth** and **Coleridge** wrote poetry inspired by personal emotional responses to nature.
---
### **Paragraph 3**
**Main Figure: Goethe**
**Main Point:**
A writer’s style is a **true impression of his inner self**.
**Key Idea:**
Clear style reflects **clearness in soul**. Good writing must show the **writer’s character**, not just technique. Goethe emphasizes **authenticity over artificial skill**.
**Definition/Example:**
He warns against **artifice**—the use of tricks or techniques without soul. For instance, compare heartfelt poetry by Emily Dickinson to overly technical but cold verse.
---
### **Paragraph 4**
**Main Figure: Walter Pater**
**Main Point:**
Pater supports the idea that great literature must reflect the **personal vision of the artist**.
**Key Idea:**
He argues that true literary beauty arises from an inner vision. **Style**, for him, is the harmonious expression of **truth and personal experience**.
**Example:**
Virginia Woolf’s stream-of-consciousness style in *Mrs. Dalloway* reflects her inner psychological depth and individual perspective.
---
### **Paragraph 5**
**Main Figures: Matthew Arnold, Goethe, Pater, Flaubert, Byron, Shakespeare**
**Main Point:**
There are two views: **subjective/personal** (literature reflects author’s personality) and **objective/impersonal** (author’s personality is hidden).
**Key Idea:**
* Writers like **Flaubert** and **Shakespeare** may suppress their personality to portray universal truths.
* Others like **Byron** project their personal passions into literature.
**Definition/Example:**
Shakespeare’s *plays* may be impersonal, but his **sonnets** are **deeply personal**, revealing love, betrayal, and pain. Byron’s works, such as *Childe Harold's Pilgrimage*, reflect his emotional turmoil.
---
### **Paragraph 6**
**Main Point:**
Despite seeming objectivity, even great writers like **Milton** and **Shakespeare** leave traces of their personality in their works.
**Key Idea:**
No writer can **fully suppress** their individuality. Literature **inevitably bears** the stamp of the writer’s **thoughts, feelings, and imaginations**.
**Example:**
Milton’s *Paradise Lost*, though epic in form, reflects **his philosophical and religious views**, especially in lines like:
> “The mind is its own place, and in itself / Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.”
---
### **Conclusion (Implied):**
Whether personal or impersonal, **literature cannot escape the author's personality**. Even the most detached works reflect the **emotional, moral, and intellectual makeup** of their creators.
---
Let me know if you'd like a simplified summary or a presentation-style breakdown next!
Comments
Post a Comment